Difference between revisions of "Talk:Western Alliance of Independent States"
(Created page with ";Western Alliance of Independent States <span style="color:#4B0082;">'''Bruce's Commentary:''' ''Keith your description of the WAIS is short, but otherwise quite an intere...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 20:07, 6 February 2015
Bruce's Commentary: Keith your description of the WAIS is short, but otherwise quite an interesting bit of commentary. You touched on a couple of interesting items I hadn't thought much about and I think a more detailed description would ideal, when and if you have a desire to do so. I found just a couple of disparities in the text. The first is the inclusion of Texas as a potential member with the possibility of holding the capital. In our story, Texas has always chosen to go it alone on the principle that it is within itself a sovereign state. The second is that the WAIS would name its police force after that of Texas' rangers seems unlikely. In general, I found your perspective to be quite refreshing, but I know there are others in the group who may raise complaints due in part to it not fitting their recollection. While their complaints might be fair, I think you should move forward in further description because one has always been needed and because the devil lies in the details.