Difference between revisions of "Talk:Western Alliance of Independent States"
(Created page with ";Western Alliance of Independent States <span style="color:#4B0082;">'''Bruce's Commentary:''' ''Keith your description of the WAIS is short, but otherwise quite an intere...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
;[[Western Alliance of Independent States]] | ;[[Western Alliance of Independent States]] | ||
<span style="color:#4B0082;">'''Bruce's Commentary:''' ''Keith your description of the WAIS is short, but otherwise quite an interesting bit of commentary. You touched on a couple of interesting items I hadn't thought much about and I think a more detailed description would ideal, when and if you have a desire to do so. I found just a couple of disparities in the text. The first is the inclusion of Texas as a potential member with the possibility of holding the capital. In our story, Texas has always chosen to go it alone on the principle that it is within itself a sovereign state. The second is that the WAIS would name its police force after that of Texas' rangers seems unlikely. In general, I found your perspective to be quite refreshing, but I know there are others in the group who may raise complaints due in part to it not fitting their recollection. While their complaints might be fair, I think you should move forward in further description because one has always been needed and because the devil lies in the details.'' | <span style="color:#4B0082;">'''Bruce's Commentary:''' ''Keith your description of the WAIS is short, but otherwise quite an interesting bit of commentary. You touched on a couple of interesting items I hadn't thought much about and I think a more detailed description would ideal, when and if you have a desire to do so. I found just a couple of disparities in the text. The first is the inclusion of Texas as a potential member with the possibility of holding the capital. In our story, Texas has always chosen to go it alone on the principle that it is within itself a sovereign state. The second is that the WAIS would name its police force after that of Texas' rangers seems unlikely. In general, I found your perspective to be quite refreshing, but I know there are others in the group who may raise complaints due in part to it not fitting their recollection. While their complaints might be fair, I think you should move forward in further description because one has always been needed and because the devil lies in the details.'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Keith's commentary: '''Thanks for the feedback. I had forgotten that it was listed that Texas was a lone country. I will make those changes. I will also have to change the map, it is inaccurate (I had also noted that the Dakota's are unified and that I needed to note that on the map.) As an outsider who has not played with you all through this timeline I have been considering changes, and the comment about the governments was very vague in the timeline...so I have been looking at options to fill in those details. I am open to critiques, I am just trying to follow the bones of what has been written and flesh out the details a little. These are the thoughts that have been around my questions as to the League of the Night and the other factions past 2022... | ||
Latest revision as of 20:44, 6 February 2015
Bruce's Commentary: Keith your description of the WAIS is short, but otherwise quite an interesting bit of commentary. You touched on a couple of interesting items I hadn't thought much about and I think a more detailed description would ideal, when and if you have a desire to do so. I found just a couple of disparities in the text. The first is the inclusion of Texas as a potential member with the possibility of holding the capital. In our story, Texas has always chosen to go it alone on the principle that it is within itself a sovereign state. The second is that the WAIS would name its police force after that of Texas' rangers seems unlikely. In general, I found your perspective to be quite refreshing, but I know there are others in the group who may raise complaints due in part to it not fitting their recollection. While their complaints might be fair, I think you should move forward in further description because one has always been needed and because the devil lies in the details.
Keith's commentary: Thanks for the feedback. I had forgotten that it was listed that Texas was a lone country. I will make those changes. I will also have to change the map, it is inaccurate (I had also noted that the Dakota's are unified and that I needed to note that on the map.) As an outsider who has not played with you all through this timeline I have been considering changes, and the comment about the governments was very vague in the timeline...so I have been looking at options to fill in those details. I am open to critiques, I am just trying to follow the bones of what has been written and flesh out the details a little. These are the thoughts that have been around my questions as to the League of the Night and the other factions past 2022...
