Magister's Reflection: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Shadow Cat (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Shadow Cat (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
'''Experience Cost:''' 35<br> | '''Experience Cost:''' 35<br> | ||
<span style="color:green | <span style="color:green"> Ok, Obtenebration to create "something" to mask, Obtenebration to mask it. Your masked shadow posing as a reflection doesn't need any substance: I don't think you need fortitude at all. Rather, I think you need greater obtenebration: the writhing shadows of obtenebration 1 are not coherent enough to appear to be a person. I'd go with Obtenebration 3 or perhaps 4 - still quite doable. | ||
<span style="color:green">The problem is that the DA rules indicate that Cloak the Gathering cannot be used in combination with Mask of a Thousand Faces. There is actually a specific rank 6 power for that. Therefore, I can't see how it can be done with obfuscate and obtenebration. -Jamie | <span style="color:green">The problem is that the DA rules indicate that Cloak the Gathering cannot be used in combination with Mask of a Thousand Faces. There is actually a specific rank 6 power for that. Therefore, I can't see how it can be done with obfuscate and obtenebration. -Jamie | ||
Revision as of 23:41, 7 March 2014
- Discipline Techniques
- Description
- System
Experience Cost: 35
Ok, Obtenebration to create "something" to mask, Obtenebration to mask it. Your masked shadow posing as a reflection doesn't need any substance: I don't think you need fortitude at all. Rather, I think you need greater obtenebration: the writhing shadows of obtenebration 1 are not coherent enough to appear to be a person. I'd go with Obtenebration 3 or perhaps 4 - still quite doable.
The problem is that the DA rules indicate that Cloak the Gathering cannot be used in combination with Mask of a Thousand Faces. There is actually a specific rank 6 power for that. Therefore, I can't see how it can be done with obfuscate and obtenebration. -Jamie