Difference between revisions of "Talk:British Isles"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <span style="color:#800000;"> '''''On the British Isles and the Tzimisce:''''' ''It is an error to state that there have been no unaligned Tzimisce in London. In 1897, a Fiend did make his way to London and was for a time allowed by Mithras to reside in Avalon. That Tzimisce was none other than [[Dracula]], the "Son of the Dragon", the Carpathian warlord and perhaps the most famous or infamous vampire in history. The story is told in Transylvanian Chronicles III and bears more than a passing resemblance to the fictitious work "Dracula." | + | <span style="color:#800000;"> '''''On the British Isles and the Tzimisce:''''' ''It is an error to state that there have been no unaligned Tzimisce in London. In 1897, a Fiend did make his way to London and was for a time allowed by Mithras to reside in Avalon. That Tzimisce was none other than [[Dracula]], the "Son of the Dragon", the Carpathian warlord and perhaps the most famous or infamous vampire in history. The story is told in Transylvanian Chronicles III and bears more than a passing resemblance to the fictitious work "Dracula." -- Bruce (17:00 - 01/21/14) |
Revision as of 18:04, 21 January 2014
On the British Isles and the Tzimisce: It is an error to state that there have been no unaligned Tzimisce in London. In 1897, a Fiend did make his way to London and was for a time allowed by Mithras to reside in Avalon. That Tzimisce was none other than Dracula, the "Son of the Dragon", the Carpathian warlord and perhaps the most famous or infamous vampire in history. The story is told in Transylvanian Chronicles III and bears more than a passing resemblance to the fictitious work "Dracula." -- Bruce (17:00 - 01/21/14)
