Talk:Joeri Darell Krusen - Revision history

Bruce at 23:45, 18 January 2016

2016-01-18T23:45:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 18 January 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:
	''I like this format better. I know it encourages "peeking" at statistics, but I like it better than the flipping through pages.''== Keith 22:36, 17 January 2016 (MST<br>		''I like this format better. I know it encourages "peeking" at statistics, but I like it better than the flipping through pages.''== Keith 22:36, 17 January 2016 (MST<br>

	''The way I see it, the second page for the statistics is good because it encourages people to read the first page which allows them to get to know the character thus saving the ST the time and effort of introducing the NPC. However, the one page format kind of thrusts the secrets right in your face so your going to see all those things whether you want to or not. But there really isn't an ideal setup for keeping NPC secrets except to not put them on the site and I like to put them on the site as a verification of ST honesty. If your character gets his ass beat, you can turn to the statistics page and see that the ST just ran the NPC well and the PC lost fairly. Too often, I have had ST change the capacities of NPCs because they couldn't figure out how to win a scenario on their own. Worse still, I have had my players accuse me of doctoring the NPCs, so this serves as confirmation that I would never do that. Besides, if ~~they~~ peek and ruin the mystery of the experience, that is all on them.'' -- "The Magister 16:43, 18 January 2016 (MST)"		''The way I see it, the second page for the statistics is good because it encourages people to read the first page which allows them to get to know the character thus saving the ST the time and effort of introducing the NPC. However, the one page format kind of thrusts the secrets right in your face so your going to see all those things whether you want to or not. But there really isn't an ideal setup for keeping NPC secrets except to not put them on the site and I like to put them on the site as a verification of ST honesty. If your character gets his ass beat, you can turn to the statistics page and see that the ST just ran the NPC well and the PC lost fairly. Too often, I have had ST change the capacities of NPCs because they couldn't figure out how to win a scenario on their own. Worse still, I have had my players accuse me of doctoring the NPCs, so this serves as confirmation that I would never do that. Besides, if the players peek and ruin the mystery of the experience, that is all on them.'' -- "The Magister 16:43, 18 January 2016 (MST)"

Bruce at 23:44, 18 January 2016

2016-01-18T23:44:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:44, 18 January 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:
	''I like this format better. I know it encourages "peeking" at statistics, but I like it better than the flipping through pages.''== Keith 22:36, 17 January 2016 (MST<br>		''I like this format better. I know it encourages "peeking" at statistics, but I like it better than the flipping through pages.''== Keith 22:36, 17 January 2016 (MST<br>

	''The way I see it, the second page for the statistics is good because it encourages people to read the first page which allows them to get to know the character thus saving the ST the time and effort of introducing the NPC. However, the one page format kind of thrusts the secrets right in your face so your going to see all those things whether you want to or not. But there really isn't an ideal setup for keeping NPC secrets except to not put them on the site and I like to put them on the site as a verification of ST honesty. If your character gets his ass beat, he can turn to the statistics page and see that the ST just ran the NPC well and the PC lost fairly. Too often, I have had ST change the capacities of NPCs because they couldn't figure out how to win a scenario on their own. Worse still, I have had my players accuse me of doctoring the NPCs, so this serves as confirmation that I would never do that. Besides, if they peek and ruin the mystery of the experience, that is all on them.'' -- "The Magister 16:43, 18 January 2016 (MST)"		''The way I see it, the second page for the statistics is good because it encourages people to read the first page which allows them to get to know the character thus saving the ST the time and effort of introducing the NPC. However, the one page format kind of thrusts the secrets right in your face so your going to see all those things whether you want to or not. But there really isn't an ideal setup for keeping NPC secrets except to not put them on the site and I like to put them on the site as a verification of ST honesty. If your character gets his ass beat, you can turn to the statistics page and see that the ST just ran the NPC well and the PC lost fairly. Too often, I have had ST change the capacities of NPCs because they couldn't figure out how to win a scenario on their own. Worse still, I have had my players accuse me of doctoring the NPCs, so this serves as confirmation that I would never do that. Besides, if they peek and ruin the mystery of the experience, that is all on them.'' -- "The Magister 16:43, 18 January 2016 (MST)"

Bruce at 23:43, 18 January 2016

2016-01-18T23:43:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:43, 18 January 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	;[[Joeri Darell Krusen]]		;[[Joeri Darell Krusen]]

	Looks like Bat Masterson. -- "The Magister 22:28, 17 January 2016 (MST)"<br>		''Looks like Bat Masterson.'' -- "The Magister 22:28, 17 January 2016 (MST)"<br>

	''Good Call! It is. I knew I knew that picture. LOL, fits him though.'' == Keith 22:33, 17 January 2016 (MST)<br>		''Good Call! It is. I knew I knew that picture. LOL, fits him though.'' == Keith 22:33, 17 January 2016 (MST)<br>
	''I like this format better. I know it encourages "peeking" at statistics, but I like it better than the flipping through pages.''== Keith 22:36, 17 January 2016 (MST<br>		''I like this format better. I know it encourages "peeking" at statistics, but I like it better than the flipping through pages.''== Keith 22:36, 17 January 2016 (MST<br>

			''The way I see it, the second page for the statistics is good because it encourages people to read the first page which allows them to get to know the character thus saving the ST the time and effort of introducing the NPC. However, the one page format kind of thrusts the secrets right in your face so your going to see all those things whether you want to or not. But there really isn't an ideal setup for keeping NPC secrets except to not put them on the site and I like to put them on the site as a verification of ST honesty. If your character gets his ass beat, he can turn to the statistics page and see that the ST just ran the NPC well and the PC lost fairly. Too often, I have had ST change the capacities of NPCs because they couldn't figure out how to win a scenario on their own. Worse still, I have had my players accuse me of doctoring the NPCs, so this serves as confirmation that I would never do that. Besides, if they peek and ruin the mystery of the experience, that is all on them.'' -- "The Magister 16:43, 18 January 2016 (MST)"

Keith at 05:36, 18 January 2016

2016-01-18T05:36:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:36, 17 January 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Looks like Bat Masterson. -- "The Magister 22:28, 17 January 2016 (MST)"<br>		Looks like Bat Masterson. -- "The Magister 22:28, 17 January 2016 (MST)"<br>

	''Good Call! It is. I knew I knew that picture. LOL, fits him though.'' == Keith 22:33, 17 January 2016 (MST)		''Good Call! It is. I knew I knew that picture. LOL, fits him though.'' == Keith 22:33, 17 January 2016 (MST)<br>
			''I like this format better. I know it encourages "peeking" at statistics, but I like it better than the flipping through pages.''== Keith 22:36, 17 January 2016 (MST<br>

Keith at 05:34, 18 January 2016

2016-01-18T05:34:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:34, 17 January 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	;[[Joeri Darell Krusen]]		;[[Joeri Darell Krusen]]

	Looks like Bat Masterson. -- "The Magister 22:28, 17 January 2016 (MST)"		Looks like Bat Masterson. -- "The Magister 22:28, 17 January 2016 (MST)"<br>

	''Good Call! It is. I knew I knew that picture. LOL, fits him though.'' == Keith 22:33, 17 January 2016 (MST)		''Good Call! It is. I knew I knew that picture. LOL, fits him though.'' == Keith 22:33, 17 January 2016 (MST)

Keith at 05:34, 18 January 2016

2016-01-18T05:34:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:34, 17 January 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Looks like Bat Masterson. -- "The Magister 22:28, 17 January 2016 (MST)"		Looks like Bat Masterson. -- "The Magister 22:28, 17 January 2016 (MST)"
			''Good Call! It is. I knew I knew that picture. LOL, fits him though.'' == Keith 22:33, 17 January 2016 (MST)

Bruce: Created page with ";Joeri Darell Krusen Looks like Bat Masterson. -- "~~~~""

2016-01-18T05:28:21Z

Created page with ";Joeri Darell Krusen Looks like Bat Masterson. -- "~~~~""

New page

;[[Joeri Darell Krusen]]

Looks like Bat Masterson. -- "The Magister 22:28, 17 January 2016 (MST)"